共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第080回

高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。

難易度設計

主要スキル:発表と協力:活動記事の情報・推論/発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論/庭づくり:報告書の情報・推論/スポーツ:メールの情報・推論/交流と案内:インタビューの情報・推論

学習ポイント

  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。

問題

セクション1:発表と協力:活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Yuna began at the music hall. Its purpose was to bring different ages together. Members worked with songs, and the first practical outcome was a concert program. Yuna brought a song sheet, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問1(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To bring different ages together.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問2(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a concert program
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a national law

問3(5点)

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To cancel the activity without discussion.
  2. To eliminate every disagreement.
  3. To give the loudest members more authority.
  4. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

問4(5点)

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション2:発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the school stage. The team, including Maki, aimed to share a favorite tradition by working with dances. One visible outcome was a dance program. Resources included a scarf. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問5(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To advertise luxury products.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To share a favorite tradition.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問6(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a national law
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a dance program

問7(5点)

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To eliminate every disagreement.
  2. To give the loudest members more authority.
  3. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
  4. To cancel the activity without discussion.

問8(5点)

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
  2. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション3:庭づくり:報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the kitchen garden. The team, including Mina, aimed to learn about different smells by working with herbs. One visible outcome was an herb label. Resources included a small pot. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

問9(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To advertise luxury products.
  3. To learn about different smells.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問10(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a travel ticket
  3. an herb label
  4. a weather forecast

問11(5点)

Why was the first comparison inconclusive?

  1. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
  2. The group had no interest in plants.
  3. No plants survived in either plot.
  4. Both plots received exactly the same treatment.

問12(5点)

What would improve the next comparison?

  1. The team should never collect further evidence.
  2. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション4:スポーツ:メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us help teammates communicate. At our meeting at the gym, we worked with basketball and prepared a team poster. Lily supplied a water bottle. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

問13(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To help teammates communicate.

問14(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a travel ticket
  2. a national law
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a team poster

問15(5点)

Why did the group change the scoring method?

  1. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.
  2. There was no way to record any progress.
  3. Every participant had the same goal.
  4. Experienced players refused to practice.

問16(5点)

What was retained after the change?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. A way to monitor participants' progress.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション5:交流と案内:インタビューの情報・推論

Interviewer: What was your project about?

James: We met at the classroom to work with school rules. We wanted to make routines easier to understand. I brought a rule sheet, and together we produced a class guide. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.

At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

問17(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To make routines easier to understand.
  2. To advertise luxury products.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問18(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a class guide
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a national law

問19(5点)

Why did the group add examples and illustrations?

  1. Visitors asked for longer sentences only.
  2. Translation was forbidden.
  3. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
  4. Every visitor already understood all instructions.

問20(5点)

How did the group check understanding?

  1. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
解答・解説を開く

問1

A. To bring different ages together.

冒頭の目的を示す to bring different ages together が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

A. a concert program

本文で成果物として a concert program が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

D. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

C. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

C. To share a favorite tradition.

冒頭の目的を示す to share a favorite tradition が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

D. a dance program

本文で成果物として a dance program が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

C. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

C. To learn about different smells.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn about different smells が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

C. an herb label

本文で成果物として an herb label が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

A. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

B. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

D. To help teammates communicate.

冒頭の目的を示す to help teammates communicate が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

D. a team poster

本文で成果物として a team poster が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

A. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

B. A way to monitor participants' progress.

後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

A. To make routines easier to understand.

冒頭の目的を示す to make routines easier to understand が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

B. a class guide

本文で成果物として a class guide が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

C. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問20

A. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。