共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第079回
高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。
難易度設計
主要スキル:交流と案内:体験記の情報・推論/図書館:体験記の情報・推論/食と交流:メールの情報・推論/食と交流:報告書の情報・推論/図書館:報告書の情報・推論
学習ポイント
- 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
問題
セクション1:交流と案内:体験記の情報・推論
When Akari arrived at the community room, the team already had a clear objective: to learn about different experiences. Working with family stories, they eventually produced a story collection. Akari contributed a photo. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.
At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
問1(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問2(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問3(5点)
Why did the group add examples and illustrations?
問4(5点)
How did the group check understanding?
セクション2:図書館:体験記の情報・推論
When Yui arrived at the community center, the team already had a clear objective: to plan a walking route. Working with travel books, they eventually produced a route poster. Yui contributed a map. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.
Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
問5(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問6(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問7(5点)
Why did the group begin with the illustrated guide?
問8(5点)
What does the decision about the expert book show?
セクション3:食と交流:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us share a family recipe. At our meeting at the dining room, we worked with soup and prepared a recipe card. Noah supplied a bowl. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
問9(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問10(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問11(5点)
Why did the group add a second food option?
問12(5点)
What limits the conclusion about attendance?
セクション4:食と交流:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the community kitchen. The team, including Aya, aimed to prepare food for volunteers by working with rice balls. One visible outcome was a meal plan. Resources included a lunch box. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
問13(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問14(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問15(5点)
Why did the group add a second food option?
問16(5点)
What limits the conclusion about attendance?
セクション5:図書館:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the museum. The team, including Sara, aimed to understand old tools by working with history books. One visible outcome was a timeline. Resources included a pencil. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
問17(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問18(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問19(5点)
Why did the group begin with the illustrated guide?
問20(5点)
What does the decision about the expert book show?
解答・解説を開く
問1
B. To learn about different experiences.
冒頭の目的を示す to learn about different experiences が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問2
C. a story collection
本文で成果物として a story collection が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問3
D. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問4
A. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問5
D. To plan a walking route.
冒頭の目的を示す to plan a walking route が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問6
A. a route poster
本文で成果物として a route poster が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問7
A. It offered an accessible starting point.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問8
D. Different sources can serve different stages of learning.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Different sources can serve different stages of learning.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問9
C. To share a family recipe.
冒頭の目的を示す to share a family recipe が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問10
D. a recipe card
本文で成果物として a recipe card が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問11
B. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問12
C. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問13
B. To prepare food for volunteers.
冒頭の目的を示す to prepare food for volunteers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問14
A. a meal plan
本文で成果物として a meal plan が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問15
C. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問16
A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問17
C. To understand old tools.
冒頭の目的を示す to understand old tools が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問18
B. a timeline
本文で成果物として a timeline が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問19
B. It offered an accessible starting point.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問20
C. Different sources can serve different stages of learning.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Different sources can serve different stages of learning.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。