共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第092回
高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。
難易度設計
主要スキル:展示と学び:体験記の情報・推論/修理と再利用:報告書の情報・推論/デザイン:メールの情報・推論/修理と再利用:インタビューの情報・推論/交流と案内:報告書の情報・推論
学習ポイント
- 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
問題
セクション1:展示と学び:体験記の情報・推論
When Saki arrived at the music room, the team already had a clear objective: to explore different sounds. Working with musical instruments, they eventually produced a sound guide. Saki contributed a recorder. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.
The group tested two descriptions of the same exhibit. One contained a long list of dates; the other asked a question and connected the object to everyday life. Visitors spent more time reading the second description. This did not prove that every visitor understood the object better. The group planned to ask visitors to explain the exhibit in their own words before deciding which description supported learning.
問1(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問2(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問3(5点)
Why was reading time insufficient as a measure?
問4(5点)
What additional evidence did the group plan to collect?
セクション2:修理と再利用:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the community hall. The team, including Sota, aimed to help younger children by working with toys. One visible outcome was a repaired toy. Resources included a screwdriver. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
問5(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問6(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問7(5点)
Why were some objects set aside?
問8(5点)
Which principle guided the decisions?
セクション3:デザイン:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us invite more people to an event. At our meeting at the art studio, we worked with posters and prepared an event poster. Olivia supplied colored paper. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
問9(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問10(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問11(5点)
Why did the group revise the design?
問12(5点)
What lesson did the group learn?
セクション4:修理と再利用:インタビューの情報・推論
Interviewer: What was your project about?
Nina: We met at the school hall to work with chairs. We wanted to keep useful furniture. I brought a paintbrush, and together we produced a painted chair. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.
Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
問13(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問14(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問15(5点)
Why were some objects set aside?
問16(5点)
Which principle guided the decisions?
セクション5:交流と案内:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the station. The team, including Honoka, aimed to help visitors find their way by working with town routes. One visible outcome was a visitor guide. Resources included a map. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
問17(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問18(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問19(5点)
Why did the group add examples and illustrations?
問20(5点)
How did the group check understanding?
解答・解説を開く
問1
C. To explore different sounds.
冒頭の目的を示す to explore different sounds が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問2
B. a sound guide
本文で成果物として a sound guide が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問3
B. Longer attention did not necessarily show better understanding.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group tested two descriptions of the same exhibit. One contained a long list of dates; the other asked a question and connected the object to everyday life. Visitors spent more time reading the second description. This did not prove that every visitor understood the object better. The group planned to ask visitors to explain the exhibit in their own words before deciding which description supported learning.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問4
C. Visitors' explanations of the exhibit.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Visitors' explanations of the exhibit.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問5
C. To help younger children.
冒頭の目的を示す to help younger children が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問6
B. a repaired toy
本文で成果物として a repaired toy が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問7
D. They needed skills beyond those of the beginners.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問8
A. Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問9
B. To invite more people to an event.
冒頭の目的を示す to invite more people to an event が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問10
D. an event poster
本文で成果物として an event poster が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問11
C. Users could not easily find essential information.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問12
C. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問13
A. To keep useful furniture.
冒頭の目的を示す to keep useful furniture が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問14
B. a painted chair
本文で成果物として a painted chair が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問15
B. They needed skills beyond those of the beginners.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問16
D. Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問17
B. To help visitors find their way.
冒頭の目的を示す to help visitors find their way が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問18
D. a visitor guide
本文で成果物として a visitor guide が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問19
B. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問20
D. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。