共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第013回
高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。
難易度設計
主要スキル:交流と案内:メールの情報・推論/発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論/食と交流:報告書の情報・推論/スポーツ:メールの情報・推論/図書館:インタビューの情報・推論
学習ポイント
- 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
問題
セクション1:交流と案内:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us share different expressions. At our meeting at the language room, we worked with local words and prepared a word collection. Daniel supplied a notebook. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
問1(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問2(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問3(5点)
Why did the group add examples and illustrations?
問4(5点)
How did the group check understanding?
セクション2:発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the school stage. The team, including Maki, aimed to share a favorite tradition by working with dances. One visible outcome was a dance program. Resources included a scarf. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.
問5(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問6(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問7(5点)
What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?
問8(5点)
What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?
セクション3:食と交流:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the community kitchen. The team, including Aya, aimed to prepare food for volunteers by working with rice balls. One visible outcome was a meal plan. Resources included a lunch box. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
問9(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問10(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問11(5点)
Why did the group add a second food option?
問12(5点)
What limits the conclusion about attendance?
セクション4:スポーツ:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us help teammates communicate. At our meeting at the gym, we worked with basketball and prepared a team poster. Lily supplied a water bottle. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.
問13(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問14(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問15(5点)
Why did the group change the scoring method?
問16(5点)
What was retained after the change?
セクション5:図書館:インタビューの情報・推論
Interviewer: What was your project about?
Tom: We met at the classroom to work with science books. We wanted to try a simple experiment. I brought a ruler, and together we produced a model bridge. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.
Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
問17(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問18(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問19(5点)
Why did the group begin with the illustrated guide?
問20(5点)
What does the decision about the expert book show?
解答・解説を開く
問1
C. To share different expressions.
冒頭の目的を示す to share different expressions が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問2
A. a word collection
本文で成果物として a word collection が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問3
D. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問4
A. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問5
C. To share a favorite tradition.
冒頭の目的を示す to share a favorite tradition が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問6
D. a dance program
本文で成果物として a dance program が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問7
C. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問8
A. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問9
B. To prepare food for volunteers.
冒頭の目的を示す to prepare food for volunteers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問10
A. a meal plan
本文で成果物として a meal plan が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問11
C. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問12
A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問13
D. To help teammates communicate.
冒頭の目的を示す to help teammates communicate が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問14
D. a team poster
本文で成果物として a team poster が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問15
A. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問16
B. A way to monitor participants' progress.
後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問17
A. To try a simple experiment.
冒頭の目的を示す to try a simple experiment が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問18
A. a model bridge
本文で成果物として a model bridge が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問19
D. It offered an accessible starting point.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問20
D. Different sources can serve different stages of learning.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Different sources can serve different stages of learning.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。