共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第062回

高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。

難易度設計

主要スキル:自然観察:メールの情報・推論/スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論/修理と再利用:メールの情報・推論/デザイン:活動記事の情報・推論/庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論

学習ポイント

  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。

問題

セクション1:自然観察:メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us notice small living things. At our meeting at the meadow, we worked with insects and prepared an insect sketch. Grace supplied a magnifying glass. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

問1(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To advertise luxury products.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To notice small living things.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問2(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. an insect sketch
  2. a national law
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a travel ticket

問3(5点)

Why was the low count difficult to interpret?

  1. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.
  2. The records already proved a permanent change.
  3. The group had never visited the area.
  4. Every observation lasted exactly the same time.

問4(5点)

What information would help future comparisons?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. Weather conditions and observation duration.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション2:スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論

When Ren arrived at the sports hall, the team already had a clear objective: to learn to practice together. Working with badminton, they eventually produced a pair-work plan. Ren contributed a towel. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

問5(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To learn to practice together.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問6(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a pair-work plan
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a national law

問7(5点)

Why did the group change the scoring method?

  1. Every participant had the same goal.
  2. There was no way to record any progress.
  3. Experienced players refused to practice.
  4. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

問8(5点)

What was retained after the change?

  1. A way to monitor participants' progress.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション3:修理と再利用:メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us reduce waste. At our meeting at the art room, we worked with bags and prepared a repaired bag. Emma supplied a sewing kit. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.

問9(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To reduce waste.
  2. To advertise luxury products.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問10(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a national law
  4. a repaired bag

問11(5点)

Why were some objects set aside?

  1. The group wanted to throw away all objects.
  2. Every object was beyond repair.
  3. They needed skills beyond those of the beginners.
  4. Only new objects were allowed in the room.

問12(5点)

Which principle guided the decisions?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション4:デザイン:活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Daichi began at the school corridor. Its purpose was to make information easier to find. Members worked with signs, and the first practical outcome was a direction sign. Daichi brought a marker, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

問13(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To make information easier to find.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To replace every activity in the town.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問14(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a direction sign
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a travel ticket

問15(5点)

Why did the group revise the design?

  1. The first version contained no information.
  2. Users refused to try it.
  3. The creators disliked all attractive designs.
  4. Users could not easily find essential information.

問16(5点)

What lesson did the group learn?

  1. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
  2. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション5:庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Aki began at the school garden. Its purpose was to help butterflies. Members worked with flowers, and the first practical outcome was a flower bed. Aki brought a watering can, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

問17(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To help butterflies.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問18(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a flower bed

問19(5点)

Why was the first comparison inconclusive?

  1. No plants survived in either plot.
  2. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
  3. Both plots received exactly the same treatment.
  4. The group had no interest in plants.

問20(5点)

What would improve the next comparison?

  1. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
解答・解説を開く

問1

C. To notice small living things.

冒頭の目的を示す to notice small living things が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

A. an insect sketch

本文で成果物として an insect sketch が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

A. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

B. Weather conditions and observation duration.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Weather conditions and observation duration.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

C. To learn to practice together.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn to practice together が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

A. a pair-work plan

本文で成果物として a pair-work plan が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

D. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. A way to monitor participants' progress.

後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

A. To reduce waste.

冒頭の目的を示す to reduce waste が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

D. a repaired bag

本文で成果物として a repaired bag が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

C. They needed skills beyond those of the beginners.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

B. Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

A. To make information easier to find.

冒頭の目的を示す to make information easier to find が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

B. a direction sign

本文で成果物として a direction sign が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

D. Users could not easily find essential information.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

A. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.

後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

B. To help butterflies.

冒頭の目的を示す to help butterflies が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

D. a flower bed

本文で成果物として a flower bed が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

B. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問20

A. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。