共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第055回
高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。
難易度設計
主要スキル:スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論/修理と再利用:メールの情報・推論/デザイン:活動記事の情報・推論/庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論/庭づくり:体験記の情報・推論
学習ポイント
- 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
問題
セクション1:スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論
When Ren arrived at the sports hall, the team already had a clear objective: to learn to practice together. Working with badminton, they eventually produced a pair-work plan. Ren contributed a towel. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.
The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.
問1(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問2(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問3(5点)
Why did the group change the scoring method?
問4(5点)
What was retained after the change?
セクション2:修理と再利用:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us reduce waste. At our meeting at the art room, we worked with bags and prepared a repaired bag. Emma supplied a sewing kit. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
問5(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問6(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問7(5点)
Why were some objects set aside?
問8(5点)
Which principle guided the decisions?
セクション3:デザイン:活動記事の情報・推論
A student project led by Daichi began at the school corridor. Its purpose was to make information easier to find. Members worked with signs, and the first practical outcome was a direction sign. Daichi brought a marker, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.
The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
問9(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問10(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問11(5点)
Why did the group revise the design?
問12(5点)
What lesson did the group learn?
セクション4:庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論
A student project led by Aki began at the school garden. Its purpose was to help butterflies. Members worked with flowers, and the first practical outcome was a flower bed. Aki brought a watering can, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.
The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
問13(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問14(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問15(5点)
Why was the first comparison inconclusive?
問16(5点)
What would improve the next comparison?
セクション5:庭づくり:体験記の情報・推論
When Hana arrived at the greenhouse, the team already had a clear objective: to observe new plants. Working with seeds, they eventually produced a growth chart. Hana contributed a paper cup. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.
The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
問17(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問18(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問19(5点)
Why was the first comparison inconclusive?
問20(5点)
What would improve the next comparison?
解答・解説を開く
問1
C. To learn to practice together.
冒頭の目的を示す to learn to practice together が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問2
A. a pair-work plan
本文で成果物として a pair-work plan が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問3
D. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問4
A. A way to monitor participants' progress.
後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問5
A. To reduce waste.
冒頭の目的を示す to reduce waste が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問6
D. a repaired bag
本文で成果物として a repaired bag が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問7
C. They needed skills beyond those of the beginners.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:Before replacing anything, the group checked whether the problem could be fixed safely. Some objects required only a small adjustment. Others had damage that beginners could not repair. These were set aside for an expert. The organizer explained that keeping an object in use was worthwhile only when it remained safe. Reducing waste did not justify ignoring the limits of the group's skills.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問8
B. Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Reuse should be balanced with safety and expertise.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問9
A. To make information easier to find.
冒頭の目的を示す to make information easier to find が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問10
B. a direction sign
本文で成果物として a direction sign が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問11
D. Users could not easily find essential information.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問12
A. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問13
B. To help butterflies.
冒頭の目的を示す to help butterflies が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問14
D. a flower bed
本文で成果物として a flower bed が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問15
B. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問16
A. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問17
A. To observe new plants.
冒頭の目的を示す to observe new plants が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問18
C. a growth chart
本文で成果物として a growth chart が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問19
B. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問20
D. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。