共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第027回
高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。
難易度設計
主要スキル:デザイン:報告書の情報・推論/庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論/交流と案内:メールの情報・推論/発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論/食と交流:報告書の情報・推論
学習ポイント
- 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
問題
セクション1:デザイン:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the reading room. The team, including Hinata, aimed to show what a story is about by working with book covers. One visible outcome was a cover design. Resources included a pencil. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
問1(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問2(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問3(5点)
Why did the group revise the design?
問4(5点)
What lesson did the group learn?
セクション2:庭づくり:活動記事の情報・推論
A student project led by Aki began at the school garden. Its purpose was to help butterflies. Members worked with flowers, and the first practical outcome was a flower bed. Aki brought a watering can, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.
The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
問5(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問6(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問7(5点)
Why was the first comparison inconclusive?
問8(5点)
What would improve the next comparison?
セクション3:交流と案内:メールの情報・推論
Dear project members, Thank you for helping us share different expressions. At our meeting at the language room, we worked with local words and prepared a word collection. Daniel supplied a notebook. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.
At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
問9(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問10(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問11(5点)
Why did the group add examples and illustrations?
問12(5点)
How did the group check understanding?
セクション4:発表と協力:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the school stage. The team, including Maki, aimed to share a favorite tradition by working with dances. One visible outcome was a dance program. Resources included a scarf. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.
問13(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問14(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問15(5点)
What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?
問16(5点)
What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?
セクション5:食と交流:報告書の情報・推論
This report concerns a project at the community kitchen. The team, including Aya, aimed to prepare food for volunteers by working with rice balls. One visible outcome was a meal plan. Resources included a lunch box. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.
The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
問17(5点)
What was the main purpose of the project?
問18(5点)
Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?
問19(5点)
Why did the group add a second food option?
問20(5点)
What limits the conclusion about attendance?
解答・解説を開く
問1
B. To show what a story is about.
冒頭の目的を示す to show what a story is about が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問2
B. a cover design
本文で成果物として a cover design が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問3
B. Users could not easily find essential information.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問4
A. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問5
B. To help butterflies.
冒頭の目的を示す to help butterflies が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問6
D. a flower bed
本文で成果物として a flower bed が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問7
B. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問8
A. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問9
C. To share different expressions.
冒頭の目的を示す to share different expressions が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問10
A. a word collection
本文で成果物として a word collection が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問11
D. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問12
A. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問13
C. To share a favorite tradition.
冒頭の目的を示す to share a favorite tradition が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問14
D. a dance program
本文で成果物として a dance program が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問15
C. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問16
A. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問17
B. To prepare food for volunteers.
冒頭の目的を示す to prepare food for volunteers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問18
A. a meal plan
本文で成果物として a meal plan が挙げられている。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問19
C. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。
問20
A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。
採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。