J 受験ヒーロー

共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第017回

高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。

難易度設計

主要スキル：発表と協力：活動記事の情報・推論／自然観察：体験記の情報・推論／食と交流：インタビューの情報・推論／自然観察：活動記事の情報・推論／発表と協力：体験記の情報・推論

学習ポイント

  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。

問題

セクション1：発表と協力：活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Yuna began at the music hall. Its purpose was to bring different ages together. Members worked with songs, and the first practical outcome was a concert program. Yuna brought a song sheet, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問1（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To bring different ages together.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問2（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a concert program
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a national law

問3（5点）

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To cancel the activity without discussion.
  2. To eliminate every disagreement.
  3. To give the loudest members more authority.
  4. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

問4（5点）

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション2：自然観察：体験記の情報・推論

When Haruto arrived at the beach, the team already had a clear objective: to learn about the sea. Working with shells, they eventually produced a shell drawing. Haruto contributed a pencil. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

問5（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To learn about the sea.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問6（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a travel ticket
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a national law
  4. a shell drawing

問7（5点）

Why was the low count difficult to interpret?

  1. The records already proved a permanent change.
  2. Every observation lasted exactly the same time.
  3. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.
  4. The group had never visited the area.

問8（5点）

What information would help future comparisons?

  1. Weather conditions and observation duration.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション3：食と交流：インタビューの情報・推論

Interviewer: What was your project about?

Luke: We met at the market to work with fruit. We wanted to learn about seasonal food. I brought a shopping bag, and together we produced a food calendar. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.

The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

問9（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To learn about seasonal food.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問10（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a food calendar
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a national law
  4. a weather forecast

問11（5点）

Why did the group add a second food option?

  1. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
  2. Nobody attended the first event.
  3. The original food was unavailable.
  4. They wanted to stop sharing ingredient information.

問12（5点）

What limits the conclusion about attendance?

  1. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション4：自然観察：活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Itsuki began at the lake. Its purpose was to observe animals without disturbing them. Members worked with birds, and the first practical outcome was a bird list. Itsuki brought a pair of binoculars, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

問13（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To advertise luxury products.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To replace every activity in the town.
  4. To observe animals without disturbing them.

問14（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a bird list

問15（5点）

Why was the low count difficult to interpret?

  1. The group had never visited the area.
  2. The records already proved a permanent change.
  3. Every observation lasted exactly the same time.
  4. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.

問16（5点）

What information would help future comparisons?

  1. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  2. Weather conditions and observation duration.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション5：発表と協力：体験記の情報・推論

When Chika arrived at the children's room, the team already had a clear objective: to make children laugh. Working with puppet shows, they eventually produced a show poster. Chika contributed a puppet. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問17（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To make children laugh.

問18（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a show poster

問19（5点）

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
  2. To eliminate every disagreement.
  3. To cancel the activity without discussion.
  4. To give the loudest members more authority.

問20（5点）

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.
解答・解説を開く

問1

A. To bring different ages together.

冒頭の目的を示す to bring different ages together が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

A. a concert program

本文で成果物として a concert program が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

D. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

C. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

B. To learn about the sea.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn about the sea が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

D. a shell drawing

本文で成果物として a shell drawing が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

C. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. Weather conditions and observation duration.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Weather conditions and observation duration.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

A. To learn about seasonal food.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn about seasonal food が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

A. a food calendar

本文で成果物として a food calendar が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

A. Some visitors could not eat the original option.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

D. To observe animals without disturbing them.

冒頭の目的を示す to observe animals without disturbing them が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

D. a bird list

本文で成果物として a bird list が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

D. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

B. Weather conditions and observation duration.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Weather conditions and observation duration.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

D. To make children laugh.

冒頭の目的を示す to make children laugh が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

D. a show poster

本文で成果物として a show poster が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

A. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問20

A. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。