共通テスト対策 英語リーディング 全国模試 第008回

高校2〜3年生・大学受験生・受験基礎。20問・各5点・100点、40分。

難易度設計

主要スキル:交流と案内:体験記の情報・推論/交流と案内:報告書の情報・推論/デザイン:体験記の情報・推論/デザイン:インタビューの情報・推論/スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論

学習ポイント

  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。

問題

セクション1:交流と案内:体験記の情報・推論

When Akari arrived at the community room, the team already had a clear objective: to learn about different experiences. Working with family stories, they eventually produced a story collection. Akari contributed a photo. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

問1(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To learn about different experiences.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問2(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a story collection
  4. a weather forecast

問3(5点)

Why did the group add examples and illustrations?

  1. Every visitor already understood all instructions.
  2. Visitors asked for longer sentences only.
  3. Translation was forbidden.
  4. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

問4(5点)

How did the group check understanding?

  1. By asking visitors to describe the next step.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション2:交流と案内:報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the station. The team, including Honoka, aimed to help visitors find their way by working with town routes. One visible outcome was a visitor guide. Resources included a map. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

問5(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To help visitors find their way.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問6(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a travel ticket
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a national law
  4. a visitor guide

問7(5点)

Why did the group add examples and illustrations?

  1. Every visitor already understood all instructions.
  2. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.
  3. Visitors asked for longer sentences only.
  4. Translation was forbidden.

問8(5点)

How did the group check understanding?

  1. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

セクション3:デザイン:体験記の情報・推論

When Nanami arrived at the craft room, the team already had a clear objective: to thank community helpers. Working with cards, they eventually produced a thank-you card. Nanami contributed a pair of scissors. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

問9(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To thank community helpers.

問10(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a national law
  4. a thank-you card

問11(5点)

Why did the group revise the design?

  1. The first version contained no information.
  2. The creators disliked all attractive designs.
  3. Users refused to try it.
  4. Users could not easily find essential information.

問12(5点)

What lesson did the group learn?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション4:デザイン:インタビューの情報・推論

Interviewer: What was your project about?

William: We met at the storage room to work with labels. We wanted to help people return shared tools. I brought a ruler, and together we produced a label set. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.

The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

問13(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To help people return shared tools.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問14(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a national law
  3. a label set
  4. a travel ticket

問15(5点)

Why did the group revise the design?

  1. Users refused to try it.
  2. Users could not easily find essential information.
  3. The first version contained no information.
  4. The creators disliked all attractive designs.

問16(5点)

What lesson did the group learn?

  1. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション5:スポーツ:体験記の情報・推論

When Ren arrived at the sports hall, the team already had a clear objective: to learn to practice together. Working with badminton, they eventually produced a pair-work plan. Ren contributed a towel. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

問17(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To learn to practice together.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問18(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a pair-work plan
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a national law

問19(5点)

Why did the group change the scoring method?

  1. Every participant had the same goal.
  2. There was no way to record any progress.
  3. Experienced players refused to practice.
  4. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

問20(5点)

What was retained after the change?

  1. A way to monitor participants' progress.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
解答・解説を開く

問1

B. To learn about different experiences.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn about different experiences が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

C. a story collection

本文で成果物として a story collection が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

D. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

A. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

B. To help visitors find their way.

冒頭の目的を示す to help visitors find their way が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

D. a visitor guide

本文で成果物として a visitor guide が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

B. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

D. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

D. To thank community helpers.

冒頭の目的を示す to thank community helpers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

D. a thank-you card

本文で成果物として a thank-you card が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

D. Users could not easily find essential information.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

B. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.

後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

B. To help people return shared tools.

冒頭の目的を示す to help people return shared tools が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

C. a label set

本文で成果物として a label set が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

B. Users could not easily find essential information.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

A. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.

後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

C. To learn to practice together.

冒頭の目的を示す to learn to practice together が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

A. a pair-work plan

本文で成果物として a pair-work plan が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

D. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問20

A. A way to monitor participants' progress.

後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。