J 受験ヒーロー

高校生の英語ドリル 第041回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル：倒置・条件／時制・過去完了／関係副詞／結果節／譲歩・前置詞／慣用表現／時・条件節／目的節／知覚動詞／名詞節whether／庭づくり：活動記事の情報・推論／食と交流：報告書の情報・推論／目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 倒置・条件の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 時制・過去完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 関係副詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 結果節の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 譲歩・前置詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 慣用表現の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 時・条件節の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的節の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 知覚動詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 名詞節whetherの表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1：倒置・条件

___ I known the truth, I would have acted differently.

問1（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Had
  2. Did
  3. Was
  4. Have

セクション2：時制・過去完了

By the time we arrived, the train ___ already left.

問2（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. is
  2. had
  3. will
  4. has

セクション3：関係副詞

This is the place ___ we first met.

問3（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. where
  2. what
  3. who
  4. which

セクション4：結果節

The book was so interesting ___ I read it twice.

問4（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. as
  2. that
  3. for
  4. to

セクション5：譲歩・前置詞

___ the rain, we continued the match.

問5（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Even though
  2. Despite
  3. While
  4. Although

セクション6：慣用表現

I would rather ___ at home tonight.

問6（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. staying
  2. stay
  3. to stay
  4. stayed

セクション7：時・条件節

I'll wait here until he ___.

問7（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. come
  2. coming
  3. comes
  4. will come

セクション8：目的節

Speak clearly so that everyone ___ hear you.

問8（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. can
  2. for
  3. as
  4. to

セクション9：知覚動詞

I saw him ___ the door.（動作の全体を表す原形を選ぶ）

問9（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. opens
  2. open
  3. opened
  4. to open

セクション10：名詞節whether

___ we can finish on time remains uncertain.

問10（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Whether
  2. If
  3. Because
  4. Despite

セクション11：庭づくり：活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Aki began at the school garden. Its purpose was to help butterflies. Members worked with flowers, and the first practical outcome was a flower bed. Aki brought a watering can, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

問11（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To help butterflies.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問12（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a flower bed

問13（5点）

Why was the first comparison inconclusive?

  1. No plants survived in either plot.
  2. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.
  3. Both plots received exactly the same treatment.
  4. The group had no interest in plants.

問14（5点）

What would improve the next comparison?

  1. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション12：食と交流：報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the community kitchen. The team, including Aya, aimed to prepare food for volunteers by working with rice balls. One visible outcome was a meal plan. Resources included a lunch box. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

問15（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prepare food for volunteers.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問16（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a meal plan
  2. a national law
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a weather forecast

問17（5点）

Why did the group add a second food option?

  1. The original food was unavailable.
  2. They wanted to stop sharing ingredient information.
  3. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
  4. Nobody attended the first event.

問18（5点）

What limits the conclusion about attendance?

  1. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション13：目的に合う英作文

問19（5点）

What can students learn through reading with a friend? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14：目的に合う英作文

問20（5点）

How can beginners be encouraged to try helping a new classmate? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

A. Had

If I had known の if を省略して Had I known。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

B. had

到着という過去より前の出発を had + 過去分詞で表す。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

A. where

後ろの we first met は完結した節。場所の where。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

B. that

so + 形容詞 + that節で結果を表す。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

B. Despite

名詞句 the rain に前置詞 Despite が続く。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

B. stay

would rather + 動詞の原形。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

C. comes

未来の出来事でも until の副詞節は現在形。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. can

so that + 主語 + can + 原形で目的。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

B. open

see + 人 + 動詞の原形で動作の全体を見る。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

A. Whether

文頭の主語節で「…かどうか」は Whether。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

B. To help butterflies.

冒頭の目的を示す to help butterflies が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

D. a flower bed

本文で成果物として a flower bed が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

B. The plots differed in sunlight as well as care.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The group compared two plots. One received regular care, while the other was checked only occasionally. More plants survived in the first plot. However, the plots also received different amounts of sunlight. The group therefore avoided claiming that the care schedule alone explained the difference. For the next comparison, they planned to use plots with similar light conditions.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

A. Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Keeping light conditions similar while comparing care schedules.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

B. To prepare food for volunteers.

冒頭の目的を示す to prepare food for volunteers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

A. a meal plan

本文で成果物として a meal plan が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

C. Some visitors could not eat the original option.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例：Through reading with a friend, students can learn how to communicate and solve problems together. They may have different ideas, so they need to listen carefully and explain their decisions. The value of the activity comes from this process as well as from the final result.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例：Beginners can be encouraged to try helping a new classmate by joining a short session with clear instructions. Working with an experienced partner can make it easier to ask questions. Organizers should explain what to bring and make clear that previous experience is not required.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。