J 受験ヒーロー

高校生の英語ドリル 第034回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル：倒置・否定語／間接疑問／仮定法過去／比較・否定／未来完了／仮定法過去完了／比較・倍数／分詞構文／wish／完了不定詞／食と交流：報告書の情報・推論／発表と協力：インタビューの情報・推論／目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 倒置・否定語の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 間接疑問の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 仮定法過去の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 比較・否定の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 未来完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 仮定法過去完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 比較・倍数の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 分詞構文の表現を文の中で使う。
  • wishの表現を文の中で使う。
  • 完了不定詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1：倒置・否定語

Never ___ seen such a view.

問1（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. did I have
  2. I have
  3. I did
  4. have I

セクション2：間接疑問

I wonder why ___ so early.

問2（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. did she leave
  2. she did left
  3. she left
  4. left she

セクション3：仮定法過去

If I ___ more time, I would join the club.

問3（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. have
  2. will have
  3. had
  4. having

セクション4：比較・否定

No other student runs ___ than Mika.

問4（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. fastest
  2. as fast
  3. faster
  4. fast

セクション5：未来完了

By next Friday, she ___ the report.（未来完了形を選ぶ）

問5（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. will have finished
  2. will finish
  3. has finished
  4. had finished

セクション6：仮定法過去完了

If she had left earlier, she ___ the train.

問6（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. would have caught
  2. would caught
  3. had catch
  4. will catch

セクション7：比較・倍数

This room is twice as ___ as that one.

問7（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. larger
  2. large
  3. largest
  4. more large

セクション8：分詞構文

___ the work, she went home.（仕事を終えてから）

問8（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Having finished
  2. Finish
  3. Has finished
  4. To finishing

セクション9：wish

I wish I ___ speak French fluently.

問9（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. will
  2. can
  3. could
  4. am

セクション10：完了不定詞

She seems ___ the answer already.

問10（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. having find
  2. to has found
  3. to finding
  4. to have found

セクション11：食と交流：報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the community kitchen. The team, including Aya, aimed to prepare food for volunteers by working with rice balls. One visible outcome was a meal plan. Resources included a lunch box. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

問11（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prepare food for volunteers.
  3. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問12（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a meal plan
  2. a national law
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a weather forecast

問13（5点）

Why did the group add a second food option?

  1. The original food was unavailable.
  2. They wanted to stop sharing ingredient information.
  3. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
  4. Nobody attended the first event.

問14（5点）

What limits the conclusion about attendance?

  1. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション12：発表と協力：インタビューの情報・推論

Interviewer: What was your project about?

Alex: We met at the reading corner to work with poems. We wanted to express personal ideas. I brought a notebook, and together we produced a poetry booklet. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問15（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To express personal ideas.

問16（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a poetry booklet
  4. a weather forecast

問17（5点）

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To cancel the activity without discussion.
  2. To give the loudest members more authority.
  3. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
  4. To eliminate every disagreement.

問18（5点）

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

セクション13：目的に合う英作文

問19（5点）

How would you evaluate a school project involving sharing a recipe? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14：目的に合う英作文

問20（5点）

How can beginners be encouraged to try growing plants? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

D. have I

否定語 Never が文頭なので have と主語を倒置。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

C. she left

間接疑問は why + 主語 + 動詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

C. had

現在の非現実的な条件には仮定法過去。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

C. faster

than の前に比較級 faster。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

A. will have finished

未来の期限までの完了は will have + 過去分詞。指示に従って未来完了形を選ぶ。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

A. would have caught

過去の非現実的な結果は would have + 過去分詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

B. large

倍数 + as + 原級 + as。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. Having finished

完了分詞構文 Having finished は主節より前の完了。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

C. could

現在の実現していない願望は wish + 仮定法。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

D. to have found

seems より前の完了は to have + 過去分詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

B. To prepare food for volunteers.

冒頭の目的を示す to prepare food for volunteers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

A. a meal plan

本文で成果物として a meal plan が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

C. Some visitors could not eat the original option.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

A. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

D. To express personal ideas.

冒頭の目的を示す to express personal ideas が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

C. a poetry booklet

本文で成果物として a poetry booklet が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

C. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

D. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例：I would evaluate a school project involving sharing a recipe by asking participants what they learned and observing whether they could explain their decisions. I would also check whether beginners felt included. A finished product alone might not show the full value of the learning process.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例：Beginners can be encouraged to try growing plants by joining a short session with clear instructions. Working with an experienced partner can make it easier to ask questions. Organizers should explain what to bring and make clear that previous experience is not required.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。