J 受験ヒーロー

高校生の英語ドリル 第027回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル：使役・受動／主語と動詞の一致／動名詞／分詞・名詞修飾／倒置・条件／時制・過去完了／関係副詞／結果節／譲歩・前置詞／慣用表現／発表と協力：インタビューの情報・推論／自然観察：メールの情報・推論／目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 使役・受動の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 主語と動詞の一致の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 動名詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 分詞・名詞修飾の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 倒置・条件の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 時制・過去完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 関係副詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 結果節の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 譲歩・前置詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 慣用表現の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1：使役・受動

We were made ___ outside.

問1（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. to wait
  2. wait
  3. waiting
  4. waited

セクション2：主語と動詞の一致

Each of the students ___ a notebook.（現在形を選ぶ）

問2（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. having
  2. had
  3. have
  4. has

セクション3：動名詞

He avoided ___ about the problem.

問3（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. talk
  2. to talk
  3. talked
  4. talking

セクション4：分詞・名詞修飾

The people ___ near the door are volunteers.

問4（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. standing
  2. stands
  3. stand
  4. stood

セクション5：倒置・条件

___ I known the truth, I would have acted differently.

問5（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Had
  2. Did
  3. Was
  4. Have

セクション6：時制・過去完了

By the time we arrived, the train ___ already left.

問6（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. is
  2. had
  3. will
  4. has

セクション7：関係副詞

This is the place ___ we first met.

問7（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. where
  2. what
  3. who
  4. which

セクション8：結果節

The book was so interesting ___ I read it twice.

問8（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. as
  2. that
  3. for
  4. to

セクション9：譲歩・前置詞

___ the rain, we continued the match.

問9（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Even though
  2. Despite
  3. While
  4. Although

セクション10：慣用表現

I would rather ___ at home tonight.

問10（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. staying
  2. stay
  3. to stay
  4. stayed

セクション11：発表と協力：インタビューの情報・推論

Interviewer: What was your project about?

Alex: We met at the reading corner to work with poems. We wanted to express personal ideas. I brought a notebook, and together we produced a poetry booklet. But the most useful lesson came from a difficulty we had to think about carefully. Here is what happened.

During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

問11（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To express personal ideas.

問12（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a poetry booklet
  4. a weather forecast

問13（5点）

What was the purpose of collecting written suggestions?

  1. To cancel the activity without discussion.
  2. To give the loudest members more authority.
  3. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.
  4. To eliminate every disagreement.

問14（5点）

What remained necessary after collecting suggestions?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  3. The team should never collect further evidence.
  4. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

セクション12：自然観察：メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us notice small living things. At our meeting at the meadow, we worked with insects and prepared an insect sketch. Grace supplied a magnifying glass. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

問15（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To advertise luxury products.
  2. To replace every activity in the town.
  3. To notice small living things.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問16（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. an insect sketch
  2. a national law
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a travel ticket

問17（5点）

Why was the low count difficult to interpret?

  1. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.
  2. The records already proved a permanent change.
  3. The group had never visited the area.
  4. Every observation lasted exactly the same time.

問18（5点）

What information would help future comparisons?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. Weather conditions and observation duration.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション13：目的に合う英作文

問19（5点）

What can students learn through studying town history? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14：目的に合う英作文

問20（5点）

What can students learn through repairing a bag? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

A. to wait

make の受動態では to不定詞が必要。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

D. has

Each は単数扱いなので現在形では has。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

D. talking

avoid の目的語は動名詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

A. standing

自ら立っている people を修飾する現在分詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

A. Had

If I had known の if を省略して Had I known。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

B. had

到着という過去より前の出発を had + 過去分詞で表す。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

A. where

後ろの we first met は完結した節。場所の where。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

B. that

so + 形容詞 + that節で結果を表す。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

B. Despite

名詞句 the rain に前置詞 Despite が続く。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

B. stay

would rather + 動詞の原形。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

D. To express personal ideas.

冒頭の目的を示す to express personal ideas が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

C. a poetry booklet

本文で成果物として a poetry booklet が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

C. To include views that were rarely heard in discussion.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：During preparation, the loudest members made most of the decisions. The group tried collecting written suggestions before discussion. This brought forward ideas from members who rarely spoke. Some suggestions conflicted, so the group still needed to discuss priorities. The new method did not remove disagreement; it made more people's views available before a decision was made.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

D. Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Discussing conflicting ideas and priorities.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

C. To notice small living things.

冒頭の目的を示す to notice small living things が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

A. an insect sketch

本文で成果物として an insect sketch が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

A. Rain had reduced the time available for observation.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The group kept records of what they saw and where they looked. On one visit, they saw very few examples, but heavy rain had shortened the observation period. They did not interpret the low count as proof of a permanent change in the area. They decided to record the weather and time spent looking so that later comparisons would account for differences in observation conditions.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

B. Weather conditions and observation duration.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Weather conditions and observation duration.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例：Through studying town history, students can learn how to communicate and solve problems together. They may have different ideas, so they need to listen carefully and explain their decisions. The value of the activity comes from this process as well as from the final result.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例：Through repairing a bag, students can learn how to communicate and solve problems together. They may have different ideas, so they need to listen carefully and explain their decisions. The value of the activity comes from this process as well as from the final result.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。