高校生の英語ドリル 第019回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル:知覚動詞/名詞節whether/主語と動詞の一致/関係代名詞what/前置詞 + 関係代名詞/動名詞の受動態/数量表現/助動詞・過去の後悔/使役動詞/完了と期間/展示と学び:メールの情報・推論/スポーツ:報告書の情報・推論/目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 知覚動詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 名詞節whetherの表現を文の中で使う。
  • 主語と動詞の一致の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 関係代名詞whatの表現を文の中で使う。
  • 前置詞 + 関係代名詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 動名詞の受動態の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 数量表現の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 助動詞・過去の後悔の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 使役動詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 完了と期間の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1:知覚動詞

I saw him ___ the door.(動作の全体を表す原形を選ぶ)

問1(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. opens
  2. open
  3. opened
  4. to open

セクション2:名詞節whether

___ we can finish on time remains uncertain.

問2(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Whether
  2. If
  3. Because
  4. Despite

セクション3:主語と動詞の一致

Neither answer ___ correct.

問3(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. be
  2. are
  3. is
  4. have

セクション4:関係代名詞what

This is ___ I was looking for.

問4(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. whose
  2. which
  3. that
  4. what

セクション5:前置詞 + 関係代名詞

This is the town in ___ I grew up.

問5(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. what
  2. that
  3. where
  4. which

セクション6:動名詞の受動態

She dislikes ___ interrupted.

問6(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. to being
  2. being
  3. been
  4. be

セクション7:数量表現

There is ___ hope, so we should keep trying.

問7(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. a few
  2. a little
  3. little
  4. few

セクション8:助動詞・過去の後悔

You should ___ me earlier.(伝えるべきだった)

問8(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. told
  2. have told
  3. have telling
  4. have tell

セクション9:使役動詞

The teacher made us ___ the essay again.

問9(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. writing
  2. written
  3. to write
  4. write

セクション10:完了と期間

I ___ him since we graduated.(今まで一度も会っていない)

問10(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. didn't see
  2. wasn't seeing
  3. don't see
  4. haven't seen

セクション11:展示と学び:メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us compare natural materials. At our meeting at the science museum, we worked with rocks and prepared a rock display. Jack supplied a magnifying glass. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

The group tested two descriptions of the same exhibit. One contained a long list of dates; the other asked a question and connected the object to everyday life. Visitors spent more time reading the second description. This did not prove that every visitor understood the object better. The group planned to ask visitors to explain the exhibit in their own words before deciding which description supported learning.

問11(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To compare natural materials.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To prove that experts were unnecessary.

問12(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a rock display
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a travel ticket

問13(5点)

Why was reading time insufficient as a measure?

  1. Dates can never be useful.
  2. The two descriptions concerned different exhibits.
  3. Longer attention did not necessarily show better understanding.
  4. Nobody read either description.

問14(5点)

What additional evidence did the group plan to collect?

  1. Visitors' explanations of the exhibit.
  2. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション12:スポーツ:報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the tennis court. The team, including Kota, aimed to practice fair play by working with tennis. One visible outcome was a match checklist. Resources included a racket. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

問15(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To practice fair play.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To replace every activity in the town.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問16(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a match checklist
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a travel ticket

問17(5点)

Why did the group change the scoring method?

  1. Every participant had the same goal.
  2. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.
  3. Experienced players refused to practice.
  4. There was no way to record any progress.

問18(5点)

What was retained after the change?

  1. The team should never collect further evidence.
  2. A way to monitor participants' progress.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The original approach needed no changes.

セクション13:目的に合う英作文

問19(5点)

Is learning alone or with others better when watching birds? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14:目的に合う英作文

問20(5点)

Is learning alone or with others better when helping a new classmate? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

B. open

see + 人 + 動詞の原形で動作の全体を見る。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

A. Whether

文頭の主語節で「…かどうか」は Whether。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

C. is

Neither + 単数名詞は単数扱い。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

D. what

先行詞を含む what は「探していたもの」。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

D. which

前置詞 in の直後に関係代名詞 which を置く。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

B. being

受動の動名詞は being + 過去分詞。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

B. a little

継続を勧める文脈で「少しはある」は a little。little は「ほとんどない」。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

B. have told

should have + 過去分詞で「…すべきだった」。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

D. write

make + 目的語 + 原形不定詞。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

D. haven't seen

since の起点から現在までの状態には現在完了。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

B. To compare natural materials.

冒頭の目的を示す to compare natural materials が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

B. a rock display

本文で成果物として a rock display が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

C. Longer attention did not necessarily show better understanding.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The group tested two descriptions of the same exhibit. One contained a long list of dates; the other asked a question and connected the object to everyday life. Visitors spent more time reading the second description. This did not prove that every visitor understood the object better. The group planned to ask visitors to explain the exhibit in their own words before deciding which description supported learning.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

A. Visitors' explanations of the exhibit.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Visitors' explanations of the exhibit.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

A. To practice fair play.

冒頭の目的を示す to practice fair play が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

B. a match checklist

本文で成果物として a match checklist が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

B. A single ranking discouraged some beginners.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The organizer initially ranked participants by speed. This made a few experienced players enthusiastic, but several beginners stopped coming. The group introduced separate personal goals and a cooperative task. They still recorded progress, but no longer used one ranking to represent everyone's success. Different goals allowed participants to challenge themselves without treating every activity as a competition against others.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

B. A way to monitor participants' progress.

後半の改善方針をまとめると A way to monitor participants' progress.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例:I think learning with others is better when watching birds. Partners can share ideas and help each other notice mistakes. However, everyone also needs time to think independently. A good activity should therefore combine discussion with opportunities for each person to practice.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安:立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例:I think learning with others is better when helping a new classmate. Partners can share ideas and help each other notice mistakes. However, everyone also needs time to think independently. A good activity should therefore combine discussion with opportunities for each person to practice.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安:立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。