高校生の英語ドリル 第013回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル:慣用表現/進行形の受動態/提案のthat節/分詞・感情/使役・受動/主語と動詞の一致/動名詞/分詞・名詞修飾/倒置・条件/時制・過去完了/デザイン:体験記の情報・推論/交流と案内:活動記事の情報・推論/目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 慣用表現の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 進行形の受動態の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 提案のthat節の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 分詞・感情の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 使役・受動の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 主語と動詞の一致の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 動名詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 分詞・名詞修飾の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 倒置・条件の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 時制・過去完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1:慣用表現

There is no point in ___ about it now.

問1(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. worrying
  2. worried
  3. to worry
  4. worry

セクション2:進行形の受動態

The hall is ___ repaired now.

問2(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. be
  2. been
  3. being
  4. have

セクション3:提案のthat節

They suggested that the meeting ___ postponed.(動詞の原形を選ぶ)

問3(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. be
  2. is
  3. was
  4. been

セクション4:分詞・感情

We were ___ by the surprising result.

問4(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. amazes
  2. amazing
  3. amaze
  4. amazed

セクション5:使役・受動

We were made ___ outside.

問5(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. to wait
  2. wait
  3. waiting
  4. waited

セクション6:主語と動詞の一致

Each of the students ___ a notebook.(現在形を選ぶ)

問6(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. having
  2. had
  3. have
  4. has

セクション7:動名詞

He avoided ___ about the problem.

問7(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. talk
  2. to talk
  3. talked
  4. talking

セクション8:分詞・名詞修飾

The people ___ near the door are volunteers.

問8(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. standing
  2. stands
  3. stand
  4. stood

セクション9:倒置・条件

___ I known the truth, I would have acted differently.

問9(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Had
  2. Did
  3. Was
  4. Have

セクション10:時制・過去完了

By the time we arrived, the train ___ already left.

問10(5点)

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. is
  2. had
  3. will
  4. has

セクション11:デザイン:体験記の情報・推論

When Nanami arrived at the craft room, the team already had a clear objective: to thank community helpers. Working with cards, they eventually produced a thank-you card. Nanami contributed a pair of scissors. The team later shared its experience with another group, emphasizing a decision that changed how they approached the work.

The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

問11(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To replace every activity in the town.
  2. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  3. To advertise luxury products.
  4. To thank community helpers.

問12(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a weather forecast
  2. a travel ticket
  3. a national law
  4. a thank-you card

問13(5点)

Why did the group revise the design?

  1. The first version contained no information.
  2. The creators disliked all attractive designs.
  3. Users refused to try it.
  4. Users could not easily find essential information.

問14(5点)

What lesson did the group learn?

  1. The original approach needed no changes.
  2. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.
  3. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  4. The team should never collect further evidence.

セクション12:交流と案内:活動記事の情報・推論

A student project led by Misaki began at the school entrance. Its purpose was to help new students feel welcome. Members worked with greetings, and the first practical outcome was a welcome sign. Misaki brought a name card, but the organizer emphasized that equipment was only one part of a successful project.

At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

問15(5点)

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To help new students feel welcome.
  3. To replace every activity in the town.
  4. To advertise luxury products.

問16(5点)

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a national law
  2. a welcome sign
  3. a travel ticket
  4. a weather forecast

問17(5点)

Why did the group add examples and illustrations?

  1. Translation was forbidden.
  2. Visitors asked for longer sentences only.
  3. Every visitor already understood all instructions.
  4. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

問18(5点)

How did the group check understanding?

  1. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.
  2. The team should never collect further evidence.
  3. The original approach needed no changes.
  4. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

セクション13:目的に合う英作文

問19(5点)

How would you evaluate a school project involving practicing a sport? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14:目的に合う英作文

問20(5点)

How can beginners be encouraged to try sharing a recipe? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

A. worrying

no point in + 動名詞で「…しても意味がない」。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

C. being

進行形の受動態は is being + 過去分詞。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

A. be

提案を表す動詞の that節で原形 be を用いる。should be も可能だが選択肢にない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

D. amazed

驚きを受けた人の状態には amazed。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

A. to wait

make の受動態では to不定詞が必要。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

D. has

Each は単数扱いなので現在形では has。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

D. talking

avoid の目的語は動名詞。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. standing

自ら立っている people を修飾する現在分詞。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

A. Had

If I had known の if を省略して Had I known。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

B. had

到着という過去より前の出発を had + 過去分詞で表す。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

D. To thank community helpers.

冒頭の目的を示す to thank community helpers が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

D. a thank-you card

本文で成果物として a thank-you card が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

D. Users could not easily find essential information.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:The first version looked attractive to its creators, but users had trouble finding essential information. The group observed people trying to use it without help. They simplified the layout and increased the contrast of important text. They learned that appearance and usefulness were separate questions. A design could be pleasing while still failing to guide someone who encountered it for the first time.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

B. An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.

後半の改善方針をまとめると An attractive appearance does not guarantee usability.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

B. To help new students feel welcome.

冒頭の目的を示す to help new students feel welcome が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

B. a welcome sign

本文で成果物として a welcome sign が挙げられている。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

D. Word-for-word translation had not ensured understanding.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠:At first, the group translated every instruction word for word. Some visitors still misunderstood what to do. The group then added examples and simple illustrations, and asked visitors to describe the next step. This revealed where instructions were unclear. Translation remained useful, but checking understanding became part of the process rather than an assumption based on the existence of a translated text.

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

D. By asking visitors to describe the next step.

後半の改善方針をまとめると By asking visitors to describe the next step.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安:正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例:I would evaluate a school project involving practicing a sport by asking participants what they learned and observing whether they could explain their decisions. I would also check whether beginners felt included. A finished product alone might not show the full value of the learning process.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安:立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例:Beginners can be encouraged to try sharing a recipe by joining a short session with clear instructions. Working with an experienced partner can make it easier to ask questions. Organizers should explain what to bring and make clear that previous experience is not required.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安:立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。