J 受験ヒーロー

高校生の英語ドリル 第002回

高校1〜3年生の総復習・標準。20問・各5点・100点、45分。

難易度設計

主要スキル：前置詞 + 動名詞／非制限用法／倒置・否定語／間接疑問／仮定法過去／比較・否定／未来完了／仮定法過去完了／比較・倍数／分詞構文／食と交流：メールの情報・推論／図書館：報告書の情報・推論／目的に合う英作文

学習ポイント

  • 前置詞 + 動名詞の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 非制限用法の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 倒置・否定語の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 間接疑問の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 仮定法過去の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 比較・否定の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 未来完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 仮定法過去完了の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 比較・倍数の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 分詞構文の表現を文の中で使う。
  • 目的・具体的情報・改善理由・結論を区別し、本文に基づいて判断する。
  • 指定された内容を英語で伝え、例と採点基準で見直す。

問題

セクション1：前置詞 + 動名詞

I'm looking forward to ___ you.

問1（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. seeing
  2. see
  3. saw
  4. seen

セクション2：非制限用法

My uncle, ___ lives in Osaka, is a doctor.

問2（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. what
  2. whom
  3. who
  4. that

セクション3：倒置・否定語

Never ___ seen such a view.

問3（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. did I have
  2. I have
  3. I did
  4. have I

セクション4：間接疑問

I wonder why ___ so early.

問4（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. did she leave
  2. she did left
  3. she left
  4. left she

セクション5：仮定法過去

If I ___ more time, I would join the club.

問5（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. have
  2. will have
  3. had
  4. having

セクション6：比較・否定

No other student runs ___ than Mika.

問6（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. fastest
  2. as fast
  3. faster
  4. fast

セクション7：未来完了

By next Friday, she ___ the report.（未来完了形を選ぶ）

問7（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. will have finished
  2. will finish
  3. has finished
  4. had finished

セクション8：仮定法過去完了

If she had left earlier, she ___ the train.

問8（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. would have caught
  2. would caught
  3. had catch
  4. will catch

セクション9：比較・倍数

This room is twice as ___ as that one.

問9（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. larger
  2. large
  3. largest
  4. more large

セクション10：分詞構文

___ the work, she went home.（仕事を終えてから）

問10（5点）

空欄に入る最も適切な語句を1つ選びなさい。

  1. Having finished
  2. Finish
  3. Has finished
  4. To finishing

セクション11：食と交流：メールの情報・推論

Dear project members, Thank you for helping us share a family recipe. At our meeting at the dining room, we worked with soup and prepared a recipe card. Noah supplied a bowl. Before our next meeting, please consider the following account of a problem we encountered and how we responded.

The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

問11（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To advertise luxury products.
  3. To share a family recipe.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問12（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a travel ticket
  2. a weather forecast
  3. a national law
  4. a recipe card

問13（5点）

Why did the group add a second food option?

  1. Nobody attended the first event.
  2. Some visitors could not eat the original option.
  3. The original food was unavailable.
  4. They wanted to stop sharing ingredient information.

問14（5点）

What limits the conclusion about attendance?

  1. The team should never collect further evidence.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション12：図書館：報告書の情報・推論

This report concerns a project at the museum. The team, including Sara, aimed to understand old tools by working with history books. One visible outcome was a timeline. Resources included a pencil. The report focuses on how the team revised its approach after reviewing what happened during the first session.

Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.

問15（5点）

What was the main purpose of the project?

  1. To prove that experts were unnecessary.
  2. To advertise luxury products.
  3. To understand old tools.
  4. To replace every activity in the town.

問16（5点）

Which outcome is mentioned in the passage?

  1. a travel ticket
  2. a timeline
  3. a weather forecast
  4. a national law

問17（5点）

Why did the group begin with the illustrated guide?

  1. It was the only source available.
  2. It offered an accessible starting point.
  3. They planned to avoid all further questions.
  4. They believed expert books were always wrong.

問18（5点）

What does the decision about the expert book show?

  1. The team should never collect further evidence.
  2. The original approach needed no changes.
  3. Different sources can serve different stages of learning.
  4. Only the appearance of the final product mattered.

セクション13：目的に合う英作文

問19（5点）

How can beginners be encouraged to try repairing a bag? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

セクション14：目的に合う英作文

問20（5点）

Is learning alone or with others better when watching birds? 自分の考えと理由または具体例を、英語30〜50語で書きなさい。

解答・解説を開く

問1

A. seeing

look forward to の to は前置詞なので動名詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問2

C. who

コンマを伴い、人を主語として補足する who。that は非制限用法で使わない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問3

D. have I

否定語 Never が文頭なので have と主語を倒置。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問4

C. she left

間接疑問は why + 主語 + 動詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問5

C. had

現在の非現実的な条件には仮定法過去。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問6

C. faster

than の前に比較級 faster。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問7

A. will have finished

未来の期限までの完了は will have + 過去分詞。指示に従って未来完了形を選ぶ。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問8

A. would have caught

過去の非現実的な結果は would have + 過去分詞。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問9

B. large

倍数 + as + 原級 + as。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問10

A. Having finished

完了分詞構文 Having finished は主節より前の完了。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問11

C. To share a family recipe.

冒頭の目的を示す to share a family recipe が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問12

D. a recipe card

本文で成果物として a recipe card が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問13

B. Some visitors could not eat the original option.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：The first menu offered a single option, and some visitors could not eat it. The group then invited visitors to state their dietary needs privately. They added a second option and labeled the ingredients. Attendance rose at the next event, but the group did not assume that the menu change was the only cause: the event had also been advertised more widely.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問14

C. Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Advertising changed at the same time as the menu.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問15

C. To understand old tools.

冒頭の目的を示す to understand old tools が根拠。結果と目的を混同しない。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問16

B. a timeline

本文で成果物として a timeline が挙げられている。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問17

B. It offered an accessible starting point.

後半の問題と判断を結び付ける。根拠：Two sources were available: a detailed book written for experts and a shorter guide with clear illustrations. The group chose the guide for the first session, then kept the book for questions that the guide did not answer. Choosing a starting point did not mean rejecting more complex information. It meant arranging information in an order that people could use.

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問18

C. Different sources can serve different stages of learning.

後半の改善方針をまとめると Different sources can serve different stages of learning.。本文にない極端な断定を避ける。

採点目安：正しい選択肢で5点。

問19

解答例：Beginners can be encouraged to try repairing a bag by joining a short session with clear instructions. Working with an experienced partner can make it easier to ask questions. Organizers should explain what to bring and make clear that previous experience is not required.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。

問20

解答例：I think learning with others is better when watching birds. Partners can share ideas and help each other notice mistakes. However, everyone also needs time to think independently. A good activity should therefore combine discussion with opportunities for each person to practice.

意見・理由・具体例の対応を確認する。評価や参加の条件にも触れると議論が明確になる。別の立場も、論理が通り指定を満たせば正解。

採点目安：立場・指定内容1点、理由・具体例2点、文法・語彙1点、語数・構成1点。解答例との一致を条件にしない。